From: | "Rohit_Behl" <Rohit_Behl(at)infosys(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Jdbc/postgres performance |
Date: | 2006-10-18 10:10:01 |
Message-ID: | 407937EC76157D439EB0C9F9B6047EFD40017D@BLRKECMSG04.ad.infosys.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi Merlin
I have disabled seq-scan and now it works like a charm. Thanks it was a saver.
Regards
Rohit
On 10/18/06, Bucky Jordan <bjordan(at)lumeta(dot)com> wrote:
> > On 10/17/06, Rohit_Behl <Rohit_Behl(at)infosys(dot)com> wrote:
> > > Select events.event_id, ctrl.real_name, events.tsds, events.value,
> > events.lds, events.correction, ctrl.type, ctrl.freq from table
> > events, iso_midw_control ctrl where events.obj_id = ctrl.obj_id and
> > events.event_id > ?::bigint order by events.event_id limit ?
> >
> After a quick search on the JDBC list, it looks like there's some
> recent discussion on the subject of how to give the planner better
> insight for prepared statements (the subject is "Blind Message" if
> you're looking...).
>
> So, I'm off to go read there and perhaps join the jdbc mailing list too.
this is not really a jdbc issue, just a practical problem with prepared statements...except for the mechanism if any the jdbc driver allows you to choose if a statement is prepared.
> But, a more general postgres question. I assume if I want to turn
> prepared statements off altogether (say I'm using a jdbc abstraction
you turn off prepared statements by not invoking sql prepare or PQprepare. (or, if jdbc implements its own protocol client, it's version of PQprepare).
> layer that likes parameterized statements, and there's other benefits
> to parameterizing other than just saving on db parse/plan) can I set
> max_prepared_transactions to 0? Is there any other option outside of
this setting is for 2pc and is not relevent to the discussion :) even if it were, im not so sure about a setting designed to enforce a partcular method of querying.
yes, you are correct this is not exactly the use case for hints being discussed in -hackers. however, imho, this is much more important and relevant so long as prepared statements continue to work the way they do.
merlin
**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2006-10-18 10:19:44 | Re: Optimization of this SQL sentence |
Previous Message | Mario Weilguni | 2006-10-18 09:31:44 | Re: Optimization of this SQL sentence |