Re: SQL Spec Compliance Questions

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL Spec Compliance Questions
Date: 2004-04-02 16:48:03
Message-ID: 406D9943.8070401@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-sql

Josh Berkus wrote:
>>4.16.2 Referenceable tables, subtables, and supertables
>> A table BT whose row type is derived from a structured type ST is
>> called a typed table. Only a base table or a view can be a typed
>> table. A typed table has columns corresponding, in name and
>> declared type, to every attribute of ST and one other column REFC
>> that is the self-referencing column of BT; let REFCN be the
>>
>>I really don't quite understand this, but I don't think we have it ;-)
> Was the SQL99 Committee smoking crack, or what? What the heck is that
> *for*?

After re-reading it, I think it is related to (or at least similar to)
the work Tom is currently doing to allow composite types as table
attributes.

Joe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-04-02 16:53:04 Re: SQL Spec Compliance Questions
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-04-02 16:38:22 Re: SQL Spec Compliance Questions

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-04-02 16:53:04 Re: SQL Spec Compliance Questions
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-04-02 16:38:22 Re: SQL Spec Compliance Questions