| From: | Bradley Kieser <brad(at)kieser(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tony and Bryn Reina <reina_ga(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |
| Date: | 2004-04-02 15:59:45 |
| Message-ID: | 406D8DF1.9080007@kieser.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
No, it isn't. Oracle is expensive but it is also the Rolls Royce, it
seems. I am a strictly OpenSource man so I don't really get into the
pricing thing, but I do know that it is also deal-by-deal and depending
on who and what you are, the prices can vary. E.g. Educational
facilities have massive discounts. Military has massive prices, etc.
Tony and Bryn Reina wrote:
>>Oracle's main drawbacks are:
>> a) VERY resource-intensive with a high process startup overhead.
>> b) VERY expensive. You are talking license fees into the £100 000s for
>>big iron installations.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Wow! 100,000 pounds for software. Now that is expensive! Is that a ballpark
>price for most of the commercial DB stuff out there? It would be interesting
>to see just how expensive (cost of licensing-wise) commercial DBs really are
>from a side-by-side matchup.
>
>-Tony
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-04-02 16:15:08 | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-04-02 15:42:28 | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |