Some Aberdeen report

From: "Magnus Naeslund(t)" <mag(at)fbab(dot)net>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Some Aberdeen report
Date: 2004-04-01 20:40:28
Message-ID: 406C7E3C.8090305@fbab.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Has anyone read this?:

http://lwn.net/Articles/78285/

It seems that it has some facts wrong about postgresql in there, for
example it claims that postgresql doesn't have rowlevel locking,
deadlock detection, or even encryption (i think protocol security here).

This might be an interesting read, and i think someone from the
marketing lists/group should send them an friendly mail pointing out any
wrong facts, i don't feel too sure about what (more) they might have
gotten wrong.

Regards
Magnus

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc Durham 2004-04-01 21:21:15 Re: row-level security model
Previous Message Randall Skelton 2004-04-01 19:48:45 Re: Select Union