Re: [Fwd: Help with Conversion]

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net>
To: pfmp(at)flav(dot)it, Pgsql-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Help with Conversion]
Date: 2004-04-01 12:15:01
Message-ID: 406C07C5.90907@frodo.hserus.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

You could look at or2pg script provided in postgresql sources, contrib section.
It might do the trick for you.

I would request you to join postgresql-general mailing list at
http://www.postgresql.org/lists.html. You could get further help you need in
your migration.

Regards
Shridhar

Shirish Joshi wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Help with Conversion
> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 00:47:21 -0500
> From: Paulo Felice Maria Petri <pfmp(at)flav(dot)it>
> Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
> Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server,comp.databases.oracle.misc
>
> Hello friends,
>
> We would like to convert our Oracle database to the free PostreSQL
> RDBMS. I would like to know the best way to export Oracle data so that I
> can load the data into PostgreSQL. Is there a text export in DDL
> statments emmbeded?
>
> Background:
> We are nearing the end of a 2 year term license for Oracle Standard
> Edition and we would like to move to something more cost effectivive. We
> would also like to run our database on a machine with more than one
> processor. I think it cost too much for a Oracle 4 CPU license. Since
> PostgreSQL is free, I can run in on a 4-way or 8-way machine without
> having to pay much more money.
>
> Also PostgreSQL seems to be the most compatible OSS database. It
> has similar triggers, PLSQL, stored procedures like Oracle etc. I also
> liked the ability to write stored procedures in Perl and Python and TCL.
> Also unlike Oracle, PostgresSQL does not come with a big Java JVM bolted
> on. Also the .ORG domain
>
> We ruled out MYSQL since it was the least like Oracle.
>
> The Karen Southwick article was very informative too.
> http://news.com.com/2010-1071-5072299.html
>
> If PostgreSQL is good for .ORG registry then it is good enough for me:
> http://www.isoc.org/dotorg/10-1.shtml
>
> "Sustaining the high-availability infrastructure that delivers this
> performance is one of the most advanced open source relational database
> systems, PostgreSQL. As detailed in our answer to Question 13,
> PostgreSQL already fully supports a 24x7, high-transaction, registry
> system:
>
> 1. it has scaled with .INFO from zero to nearly one million domains
> via its large capacity and its concurrency capability (multi-version
> concurrency control);
> 2. it provides all database functions required by .INFO (and .ORG);
> 3. it delivers (as evidenced above) at our service level commitments
> or better;
> 4. it benefits from broad usage (RedHat, BASF, and others) and
> support by a significant base of developers; and
> 5. it provides high data portability and standards compliance,
> including native JDBC/ODBC support."
>
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
>

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-04-01 14:10:18 Re: 7.2.3-7.4.2 migration
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2004-04-01 12:05:28 Re: Problem restoring Database