Re: confusion about this commit "Revert "Skip redundant anti-wraparound vacuums""

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jiye <jiye_sw(at)126(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: confusion about this commit "Revert "Skip redundant anti-wraparound vacuums""
Date: 2023-06-05 03:37:03
Message-ID: 4068553.1685936223@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

jiye <jiye_sw(at)126(dot)com> writes:
> in our test enviroment, if one database's have major update operations, autovacuum does not work and cause major performance degradation.
> if found this issue may be resolved by revert this Skip redundant anti-wraparound vacuums · postgres/postgres(at)2aa6e33 (github.com) commit.

Please provide a self-contained test case illustrating this report.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2023-06-05 05:36:52 Re: [16Beta1][doc] pgstat: Track time of the last scan of a relation
Previous Message jiye 2023-06-05 03:30:48 confusion about this commit "Revert "Skip redundant anti-wraparound vacuums""