From: | Alexander Staubo <alex(at)byzantine(dot)no> |
---|---|
To: | Freddy Villalba Arias <fvillalba(at)madrid(dot)bilbomatica(dot)es> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL JDBC Mailing List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Support for 2-Phase Commit protocol |
Date: | 2004-03-29 16:15:17 |
Message-ID: | 40684B95.4030303@byzantine.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
This is on the PostgreSQL todo list:
http://developer.postgresql.org/todo.php
However, as far as I know it's not something people are working
actively on, or at least not to the extent that we will see a release
in the near term. I would like to be wrong, though.
Seeing as this is a server issue and not specifically a JDBC issue,
the pgsql-hackers list is probably the place to ask about the
development status of future features.
To my knowledge, Firebird (http://www.firebirdsql.org/) is the only
open-source database that supports two-phase commits; its JDBC driver
comes with JTA support. You may have better luck with that. Firebird
is itself a decent database, but is going to feel like a step back
into the '80s once you've gotten used to PostgreSQL's sleek, modern
facilities [*].
[*] Variable-length "text" data type that does not need a pre-declared
size, virtually unlimited row sizes, online alter/drop/rename for
tables/columns/etc., ability to index fields declared as >250 chars
long, SQL shell with proper readline support, intelligible error
messages, mature documentation, I could go on.
Alexander.
on 2004-03-29 17:19 Freddy Villalba Arias wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
>
>
> I forgot to include this other question (also urgent, sorry if I’m
> stressing you up): does anybody know what is PostgreSQL’s current status
> regarding “Two Phase Commit Protocol Support”?
>
>
>
> Again, thanx.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Freddy.
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Staubo | 2004-03-29 16:30:06 | Re: OutOfMemory |
Previous Message | Wagner,Harry | 2004-03-29 15:57:08 | Re: OutOfMemory |