| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera Munoz <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation of server configuration |
| Date: | 2004-11-14 00:17:35 |
| Message-ID: | 4065.1100391455@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
Alvaro Herrera Munoz <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 04:17:26PM -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
>> I thought runtime-config was supposed to be ordered in the same order as the
>> default postgresql.conf ?
> To what end? A lot of people may want to look up parameters without
> necessarily looking at postgresql.conf.
There was a great deal of effort put into categorizing the runtime
parameters just a release or two back. Both runtime.sgml and the
postgresql.conf sample file follow that categorization.
I'm not sure if Peter is saying he doesn't like the current
categorization, or that he doesn't believe in the idea at all.
But I don't think "one big list" will fly.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | elein | 2004-11-14 01:05:11 | Re: Documentation of server configuration |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera Munoz | 2004-11-13 22:00:27 | Re: Documentation of server configuration |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | elein | 2004-11-14 01:05:11 | Re: Documentation of server configuration |
| Previous Message | Patrick B Kelly | 2004-11-14 00:15:00 | Re: I spoke with Marc from the postgresql mailing list. |