| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Frank Wiles <frank(at)wiles(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu, neilc(at)samurai(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
| Date: | 2004-03-25 02:02:34 |
| Message-ID: | 40623DBA.5020409@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> It does have some downsides that I have found, most notibly that the
> size of your sources you have in your working copy are essentially
> doubled. There is a copy in your .svn directory that allows the
> offline status, diff, and revert commands to work.
What's needed is a good window client like WinCVS, however...
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Naeslund(t) | 2004-03-25 02:22:47 | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
| Previous Message | Shawn Harrison | 2004-03-25 00:22:16 | Re: self referencing tables/ nested sets etc... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Naeslund(t) | 2004-03-25 02:22:47 | Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-03-25 02:01:40 | Re: pg_advisor schema proof of concept |