| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: COPY formatting |
| Date: | 2004-03-19 21:43:56 |
| Message-ID: | 405B699C.4050901@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>Overall, I assert again that approaching this issue through COPY enhancements
>is really not the way to go. We should be looking at a client utility,
>like pg_import and pg_export. The primary purpose of COPY is bulk loads
>for backup/restore, and I'm against doing a lot of tinkering which might make
>it less efficient or introduce new issues into what's currently very
>reliable.
>
>
>
That's not unreasonable. I floated my idea as an alternative to a much
more radical proposal. If we decided against it we should remove the
TODO item.
As against that, if we don't do this then I think we should embrace
these utility programs more, possibly bringing them into the distribution.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Brown | 2004-03-20 03:48:17 | Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-03-19 21:14:15 | Re: COPY formatting |