From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: sequential scan when using bigint value |
Date: | 2004-03-19 14:43:11 |
Message-ID: | 405B06FF.50603@potentialtech.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
David Garamond wrote:
> I have a table of 2mil records. The table consists of two columns, id
> (BYTEA/GUID, PK) and i (INT, UNIQUE INDEX). Could someone explain why,
> when using a bigint value like this:
>
> select * from partition where i=3000000000;
>
> or
>
> select * from partition where i in (1,2,3,3000000000);
>
> Postgres immediately switches from index scan to seq scan?
I believe it's in the FAQ. But Postgres always uses a sequential scan
when types don't match.
If you're going to be looking for BIGINTs in that table, you should
probably set i to BIGINT and always cast your search criterea to
BIGINT. Otherwise, I can't imagine why you would be looking for a
BIGINT in an INT field.
--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pierre Didelon | 2004-03-19 14:58:18 | unsigned types, binary op. and cast pb |
Previous Message | David Garamond | 2004-03-19 14:26:08 | Index selection (and partial index) for BYTEA field |