| From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions |
| Date: | 2021-12-07 18:59:02 |
| Message-ID: | 405A7844-BD85-4D2E-AA1E-7073DC6A6F62@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Dec 7, 2021, at 10:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I'm not entirely following ... are you suggesting that each released minor
> version needs to be kept buildable separately?
No. I'm just wondering if we want to share the product of such efforts if anybody (me, for instance) volunteers to do it for some subset of minor releases. For my heap corruption checking work, I might want to be able to build a small number of old minor releases that I know had corruption bugs.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-12-07 19:13:15 | Re: Why doesn't pgstat_report_analyze() focus on not-all-visible-page dead tuple counts, specifically? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-12-07 18:52:34 | Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions |