| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Arthur Ward <award(at)dominionsciences(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart |
| Date: | 2004-03-17 19:38:54 |
| Message-ID: | 4058A94E.10808@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Arthur Ward wrote:
> Jan's vacuum-delay-only patch that nobody can find is here:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-11/msg00518.php
>
> I've been using it in testing & production without any problems.
Great to know -- many thanks.
I've hacked my own vacuum-delay-only patch form Jan's all_performance
patch. It looks like the only difference is that it uses usleep()
instead of select(). So far the tests look promising.
Thanks,
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2004-03-17 19:45:21 | Re: Further thoughts about warning for costly FK checks |
| Previous Message | Silvio Mazzaro | 2004-03-17 19:24:08 | Problem on cluster initialization |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-17 19:48:31 | Re: atrocious update performance |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2004-03-17 19:19:36 | Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart |