Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart
Date: 2004-03-16 05:38:03
Message-ID: 405692BB.1020905@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>>Any idea where I can get my hands on the latest version. I found the
>>original post from Tom, but I thought there was a later version with
>>both number of pages and time to sleep as knobs.
>
> That was as far as I got. I think Jan posted a more complex version
> that would still be reasonable to apply to 7.4.

I thought that too, but was having trouble finding it. I'll look again.

Thanks,

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2004-03-16 05:39:39 Re: Reducing expression evaluation overhead
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2004-03-16 05:32:27 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2004-03-16 05:48:05 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2004-03-16 05:32:27 Re: rapid degradation after postmaster restart