Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
Date: 2025-04-08 17:22:41
Message-ID: 4052302.1744132961@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com> writes:
> In copy case I would expect the presence of grants to not make much difference.

aclitemin is slower than a lot of other datatype input functions,
but it's still got to be faster than a GRANT.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2025-04-08 17:36:08 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-04-08 17:22:00 Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects