Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org

Dave Page wrote:

>
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
>>Sent: 12 March 2004 13:57
>>To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
>>Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org
>>
>>
>>Isn't gforge a pgsql related project itself?
>>So I'd suggest:
>>
>>www.postgresql.org -> main PostgreSQL site
>>gforge.postgresql.org -> gforge interface site
>><projectname>.postgresql.org -> gforge hosted projects
>>
>>
>
>The problem with that approach is that our 'official' sites then get
>lost amongst the project sites.
>
>We need some distinction between the core project sites and other
>project sites - istm that a different domain is the only way to do that.
>
>
>

(breaking previous rule) I agree.

Also, the gforge people would prefer us *not* to use a name that
includes gforge, because of the risk of confusion. That's how we came up
with "pgfoundry" in the first place.

cheers

andrew