| From: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Log rotation |
| Date: | 2004-03-12 00:28:41 |
| Message-ID: | 40510439.1010505@redhat.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Please remind me again why the postmaster cannot close and open the log
file when it receives a SIGHUP (to re-read configuration)? This was
discussed before but I cannot remember if and why this was not possible
or if the arguments are still valid after -l was added.
If this was possible it could even be done after re-reading the
configuration and even use the value of a GUC variable for the log file
name, which would allow us to change the value of -l without the need to
restart (actualy, with a GUC variable set in postgresql.conf one could
set the log without the -l, but would perhaps lose a few initial messages).
regards to all,
Fernando
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-03-12 00:38:25 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-12 00:16:41 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |