Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech>
Cc: "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Nazir Bilal Yavuz" <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Bo Anderson" <mail(at)boanderson(dot)me>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0
Date: 2023-11-28 01:32:28
Message-ID: 4050375.1701135148@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech> writes:
> On Mon Nov 27, 2023 at 7:14 PM CST, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... If the function
>> does exist in 0.9.8 then I concur that we don't need to test.

> I have gone back all the way to 1.0.0 and confirmed that the function
> exists. Didn't choose to go further than that since Postgres doesn't
> support it.

Since this is something we'd need to back-patch, OpenSSL 0.9.8
and later are relevant: the v12 branch still supports those.
It's moot given Bo's claim about the origin of the function,
though.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2023-11-28 02:00:53 Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe)
Previous Message Tristan Partin 2023-11-28 01:28:19 Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0