From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech> |
Cc: | "Michael Paquier" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Nazir Bilal Yavuz" <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "Bo Anderson" <mail(at)boanderson(dot)me>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0 |
Date: | 2023-11-28 01:32:28 |
Message-ID: | 4050375.1701135148@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Tristan Partin" <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech> writes:
> On Mon Nov 27, 2023 at 7:14 PM CST, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... If the function
>> does exist in 0.9.8 then I concur that we don't need to test.
> I have gone back all the way to 1.0.0 and confirmed that the function
> exists. Didn't choose to go further than that since Postgres doesn't
> support it.
Since this is something we'd need to back-patch, OpenSSL 0.9.8
and later are relevant: the v12 branch still supports those.
It's moot given Bo's claim about the origin of the function,
though.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2023-11-28 02:00:53 | Re: Testing autovacuum wraparound (including failsafe) |
Previous Message | Tristan Partin | 2023-11-28 01:28:19 | Re: SSL tests fail on OpenSSL v3.2.0 |