Re: Slony-I makes progress

From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slony-I makes progress
Date: 2004-03-10 20:44:48
Message-ID: 404F7E40.6070304@Yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers

Christopher Browne wrote:

>
> Further bonus: the "GUI project" need only have a database connection
> to one of the databases to control things. No need for ANYTHING else.
>
> After fleshing it out a little, that's a pretty slick approach.

You miss the point, sorry.

This "make GUI easy to write" approach leads to one major problem. When
a central server in the cluster dies and the communication path's need
to be redirected and the utility needs to contact all the remaining
servers because they're not doing the big group chat always, but now
their regular communication path is disrupted ... your GUI (the only
thing wannabe-DBA's know) becomes useless and the whole plan with
failover and backup systems falls apart.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jyrki Wahlstedt 2004-03-11 11:08:29 problem (Mac OS X 10.3, low priority)
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2004-03-09 20:55:37 Re: Translation

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-10 20:47:52 Re: selective statement logging
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2004-03-10 20:36:50 Re: Timing of 'SELECT 1'