From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: cvs breakage |
Date: | 2004-03-09 23:05:39 |
Message-ID: | 404E4DC3.9040104@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>
>>This is for the 7.5/HEAD tree, so it is bumped. What we don't do is
>>bump during development.
>>
>>
>
>No, we shouldn't do intermediate bumps during a devel cycle. Andrew,
>did you have an earlier 7.5devel libpq.so installed someplace? If so
>that's the gotcha you have to watch out for. The numbering is intended
>to keep libpqs from different release cycles separate, but not within a
>cycle.
>
>
>
Yes, in the location pointed to by --prefix ...
I fully understand now. And it was fixed by truning off rpath.
Is this gotcha mentioned anywhere in documentation?
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-03-09 23:07:28 | Re: PITR Functional Design v2 for 7.5 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-09 23:00:56 | Re: cvs breakage |