Re: cvs breakage

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cvs breakage
Date: 2004-03-09 23:05:39
Message-ID: 404E4DC3.9040104@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>
>>This is for the 7.5/HEAD tree, so it is bumped. What we don't do is
>>bump during development.
>>
>>
>
>No, we shouldn't do intermediate bumps during a devel cycle. Andrew,
>did you have an earlier 7.5devel libpq.so installed someplace? If so
>that's the gotcha you have to watch out for. The numbering is intended
>to keep libpqs from different release cycles separate, but not within a
>cycle.
>
>
>

Yes, in the location pointed to by --prefix ...

I fully understand now. And it was fixed by truning off rpath.

Is this gotcha mentioned anywhere in documentation?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-03-09 23:07:28 Re: PITR Functional Design v2 for 7.5
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-09 23:00:56 Re: cvs breakage