Re: Fixed width rows faster?

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>
To: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fixed width rows faster?
Date: 2004-03-05 14:07:34
Message-ID: 404889A6.7@potentialtech.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Jeff wrote:
> I'm guessing the answer to this is "no"
>
> Is there any performance advantage to using a fixed width row (with PG)?

No. The user docs state that the performance is equal for char, varchar
and text.

> I've heard this theory a few times and I think it is based on older,
> different databases

MySQL used to have this issue (I don't know if it still does or not) to
the point that the docs once claimed that an index on a varchar was barely
as fast as a char with no index at all.

> and we have also some custom software here that uses
> fixed width rows to be able to hit row N in O(1), but that isn't what
> I'd call a real database.

Isn't needed in modern versions of Postgres, but I don't know (historically)
if it ever was or not.

--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Bjorklund 2004-03-05 14:31:44 Re: Fixed width rows faster?
Previous Message Jeff 2004-03-05 13:35:05 Fixed width rows faster?