| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
| Date: | 2022-02-11 21:11:18 |
| Message-ID: | 4046b275-bb0c-9bdb-2ab6-ed87a19bd686@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/11/22 15:47, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 3:40 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> I'm not really sure any single parameter name is going to capture the
>> subtlety involved here.
> I mean to some extent that's inevitable, but it's not a reason not to
> do the best we can.
True.
I do think we should be wary of any name starting with "LOG", though.
Long experience tells us that's something that confuses users when it
refers to the WAL.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-02-11 21:17:37 | Re: Merging statistics from children instead of re-sampling everything |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2022-02-11 21:08:31 | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |