| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Date: | 2004-02-27 19:12:31 |
| Message-ID: | 403F969F.70005@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www |
Greg Stark wrote:
>
>I also dislike BZ for aesthetic reasons. If one person is editing a ticket
>while another person updates the same ticket, it refuses your edits and you
>have to start all over. I think all the updates are stored in one big field.
>
>
AFAICS it's one row per comment, at least in the 2.17 code base. BZ does
have horrible locking issues - they are being dealt with as part of the
bugs I referred to elsewhere.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-27 23:31:14 | Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-27 18:48:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tswan | 2004-02-27 19:34:41 | Re: Tablespaces |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-27 19:05:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-27 23:31:14 | Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-27 18:48:57 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2004-02-27 19:41:22 | Re: Short notice, but ... |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-27 19:05:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal |