| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Shelby Cain <alyandon(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] select statement against pg_stats returns |
| Date: | 2004-02-25 04:07:20 |
| Message-ID: | 403C1F78.9070308@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> I don't think so --- we weren't trying to use it as an actual column
> datatype back then.
>
> 7.4 has a problem though :-( ... this is one of the "damn I wish we'd
> caught that before release" ones, since it can't easily be fixed without
> initdb. Reminds me that I need to get to work on making pg_upgrade
> viable again.
Has anyone given any thought as to whether dumping and restoring
pg_statistic is worthwhile?
eg. some sort of ALTER TABLE..SET STATISTICS (1.0, 3.3, 'asdf',....)
command?
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Humble Geek | 2004-02-25 04:11:37 | PLSQL Question regarding multiple inserts |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-25 03:35:04 | Re: select statement against pg_stats returns inconsistent data |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-25 04:15:26 | Re: [HACKERS] select statement against pg_stats returns inconsistent data |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-25 04:07:15 | Re: bgwriter never dies |