From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Richard Neill <rn214(at)hermes(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>, rn214(at)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk, PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #1082: Order by doesn't sort correctly. |
Date: | 2004-02-24 13:17:21 |
Message-ID: | 403B4EE1.3040607@pse-consulting.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
>Richard Neill <rn214(at)hermes(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
>
>
>>This ordering is perverse!
>>
>>
>
>No kidding.
>
>
>
>>No matter what the priority is of the
>>different characters, I cannot understand how the above can arise.
>>
>>
>
>You are assuming that it's a byte-at-a-time process. It's not. I
>believe the first pass considers only letters and digits.
>
>You can easily prove to yourself that it's not just Postgres. Here's
>an example on my Linux laptop:
>
>[tgl(at)g3 tgl]$ cat zzz
>Cymbal #1
>Cymbal - 18 inch
>Cymbal #2
>[tgl(at)g3 tgl]$ LC_ALL=C sort zzz
>Cymbal #1
>Cymbal #2
>Cymbal - 18 inch
>[tgl(at)g3 tgl]$ LC_ALL=en_GB sort zzz
>Cymbal #1
>Cymbal - 18 inch
>Cymbal #2
>[tgl(at)g3 tgl]$
>
>
I verified this, and it's not GB specific as one might suggest... Same
with en_US, de_DE, fr_FR, af_ZA. Does this behaviour really make sense
to anybody?
Regards,
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2004-02-24 13:25:46 | Re: BUG #1082: Order by doesn't sort correctly. |
Previous Message | Martin Langhoff | 2004-02-24 10:47:48 | Re: BUG #1083: Insert query reordering interacts badly with |