Re: Boolean partitions syntax

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: jonathan(dot)katz(at)excoventures(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com, dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Boolean partitions syntax
Date: 2018-04-19 08:27:54
Message-ID: 40347da5-87c7-bf45-6aae-c2b50e198645@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/04/18 19:27, Amit Langote wrote:
> Please find attached an updated version of your patch. I think we'll need
> to make some documentation changes and think about a way to back-patch
> this to PG10.

Added documentation changes. Also, noticed that there was no need to
change the production for b_expr, so fixed that.

See attached updated patch.

Thanks,
Amit

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Allow-generalized-expression-syntax-for-partition.patch text/plain 19.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikhil Sontakke 2018-04-19 08:52:33 initdb fails to initialize data directory
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2018-04-19 08:09:29 Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes.