From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, Postgresql Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Clustered Postgresql |
Date: | 2004-02-16 20:21:49 |
Message-ID: | 4031265D.8070704@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Rod Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 15:02, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
>>Rod Taylor wrote:
>>
>>>http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040129/lath071_1.html
>>
>>Is it really true what they claim: linear scalability with new nodes
>>(for reads)? This seems like a 'better replication than replication'.
>
Well just about any replication can give you that... My curiousity lies
in how well they scale with writes.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> I don't know.
>
> It is possible, but I would assume it's not intended for clusters
> smaller than 4 to 8 standard machines.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 640 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-16 21:43:12 | Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy |
Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2004-02-16 20:11:50 | Re: Clustered Postgresql |