From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jonathan Wright <jonathan(at)almalinux(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Add AlmaLinux as Specifically Supported Distro |
Date: | 2022-01-04 16:23:39 |
Message-ID: | 4031030.1641313419@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Jonathan Wright <jonathan(at)almalinux(dot)org> writes:
> My name is Jonathan Wright and I'm in the Infrastructure Team Lead for
> AlmaLinux. I/we use Postgres (naturally) and today I noticed that
> AlmaLinux is missing as a specifically listed supported distro at
> https://www.postgresql.org/download/ and
> https://www.postgresql.org/download/linux/redhat/
> I see that Rocky was added which is great, but I think it would also be
> appropriate to add AlmaLinux.
Well, the reason Rocky is listed is that it *is* considered supported,
which is because somebody is running a buildfarm animal under that OS:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=queensnake&br=HEAD
I don't see any animal running Alma, so claiming that it's supported
seems a bit premature. If you'd like to run such an animal, see
directions here:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/register-form.pl
It's not terribly resource-consuming, if you set it up to run once a
day per branch, which is plenty for a platform that ought-to-work.
(There's a separate question of whether Devrim's RPMs will work
out-of-the-box on Alma, or whether it'll need its own build.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan Wright | 2022-01-04 16:24:52 | Re: Add AlmaLinux as Specifically Supported Distro |
Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2022-01-04 16:13:01 | Re: Add AlmaLinux as Specifically Supported Distro |