Re: Add planner support function for starts_with()

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add planner support function for starts_with()
Date: 2021-11-17 19:00:13
Message-ID: 402AA5E7-A27C-482C-BA9C-44FE0FC3950B@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/9/21, 10:24 AM, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> With the (admittedly later) introduction of planner support functions,
> it's really quite easy to do better. The attached patch adds a planner
> support function for starts_with(), with these benefits:

The patch looks reasonable to me.

Nathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2021-11-17 19:13:02 Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<<postmaster_pid>>)?
Previous Message Euler Taveira 2021-11-17 18:59:59 Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<<postmaster_pid>>)?