From: | Joshua Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John Gibson <gib(at)edgate(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium |
Date: | 2004-02-09 17:18:17 |
Message-ID: | 4027C0D9.2040702@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
John Gibson wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I need to upgrade my dual Xeon PostgreSQL engine.
>
> Assuming similar memory and disk sub-systems, I am considering a Quad
> Xeon system vs. a Dual Itanium for PostgreSQL. I believe that the
> PostgreSQL code is written for 32 bit and not optimized for the 64 bit
> Itanium cpu. That makes me think that the Xeon system would be a better
> choice.
> '
Bang for the buck per CPU you are best off using an Opteron based
solution from AMD. This will give you the 64bit address space that Xeon
can't but for a heck of a lot less money than an Itanium.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
> Do any of you have thoughts on:
>
> 1. Straight performance capability
> 2. Price/Performance
>
>
> I would appreciate any feedback you might have.
>
>
> ...john
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 347 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lincoln Yeoh | 2004-02-09 17:18:43 | Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium |
Previous Message | Ed L. | 2004-02-09 17:17:41 | Re: Increasing Max Connections Mac OS 10.3 |