Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Federico <cfederico87(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error
Date: 2021-05-05 15:28:31
Message-ID: 4026666.1620228511@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs

Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 19:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So what I was remembering was some text in the section about sequence
>> functions. That probably seemed appropriate when they were the only
>> real use of regclass; but these days we have regclass-accepting functions
>> all over, not to mention other OID alias types. I propose the attached
>> patch to move this info into the "Object Identifier Types" section.

> That patch looks good to me.
> I think it is an improvement to have that discussed under "data types".

Pushed, thanks for reviewing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-05-05 16:24:17 Re: ALTER CONSTRAINT on a partitioned FK isn't working
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-05-05 14:31:10 Re: BUG #16993: Query Planner does not use index for EXISTS-query on a large table with all equal foreign key values

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Federico 2021-05-05 19:17:49 Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2021-05-05 10:03:08 Re: Update maintenance_work_mem/autovacuum_work_mem to reflect the 1GB limitation with VACUUM