From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | Federico <cfederico87(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error |
Date: | 2021-05-05 15:28:31 |
Message-ID: | 4026666.1620228511@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-docs |
Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 19:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So what I was remembering was some text in the section about sequence
>> functions. That probably seemed appropriate when they were the only
>> real use of regclass; but these days we have regclass-accepting functions
>> all over, not to mention other OID alias types. I propose the attached
>> patch to move this info into the "Object Identifier Types" section.
> That patch looks good to me.
> I think it is an improvement to have that discussed under "data types".
Pushed, thanks for reviewing.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-05-05 16:24:17 | Re: ALTER CONSTRAINT on a partitioned FK isn't working |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-05-05 14:31:10 | Re: BUG #16993: Query Planner does not use index for EXISTS-query on a large table with all equal foreign key values |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Federico | 2021-05-05 19:17:49 | Re: BUG #16991: regclass is not case sensitive causing "relation does not exist" error |
Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-05-05 10:03:08 | Re: Update maintenance_work_mem/autovacuum_work_mem to reflect the 1GB limitation with VACUUM |