Re: 7.2.3 vacuum bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.2.3 vacuum bug
Date: 2002-10-31 05:02:40
Message-ID: 4024.1036040560@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Ok, fair enough -- I agree that we should treat the two cases
> differently. But one thing I think we should do in any case is improve
> the wording of the error message.

Got a suggestion?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-10-31 05:16:47 Re: move 0 behaviour
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-10-31 04:57:29 Re: 7.2.3 vacuum bug