Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test?

Mike Nolan wrote:
>> Seriously, I am tired of this kind of question. You gotta get bold
>> enough to stand up in a "meeting" like that, say "guy's, you can ask me
>> how this compares to Oracle ... but if you're seriously asking me how
>> this compares to MySQL, call me again when you've done your homework".
>
> Can they call you at the unemployment office?

It might not work with the words I used above, but the point I tried to
make is that the hardest thing you can "sell" is a "no". I mean, not
just saying "no", but selling it in a way that the customer will not go
with the next idiot who claims "we can do that".

If the customer has a stupid idea, like envisioning an enterprise
solution based on ImSOL, there is no way you will be able to deliver it.
Paying customer or not, you will fail if you bow to their "strategic"
decisions and ignore knowing that the stuff they want to use just
doesn't fit.

That is absolutely not ImSOL specific. If someone comes to me and asks
for a HA scenario with zero transaction loss during failover, we can
discuss a little if this is really what he needs or not, but if he needs
that, the solution will be Oracle or DB2, for sure I will not claim that
PostgreSQL can do that, because it cannot.

Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #