Re: Sigh, we need an initdb

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sigh, we need an initdb
Date: 2014-06-04 22:00:45
Message-ID: 4021.1401919245@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Fwiw I tried to use the pg_lsn data type the other day and pretty much
> immediately ran into the lack of the btree operator class. Pretty much
> the first thing I did when I loaded the data was "select ... order by
> lsn".

Agreed, now that we're going to force an initdb anyway, that fix is
high priority. I'll take a look at the patch shortly.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ali Akbar 2014-06-04 22:35:14 Re: Fix xpath() to return namespace definitions
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-06-04 21:16:28 Re: Sigh, we need an initdb