From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 64 bit numbers vs format strings |
Date: | 2025-03-17 15:48:15 |
Message-ID: | 4013567.1742226495@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 8:09 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Hmm, I find that comment fairly scary. How do we know that the
>> runtime library actually gets this right on every supported platform?
> I don't know too much about libintl and its history other than what
> I've looked up for these discussions, but I can't find any other
> implementations other than Sun's, GNU's and NetBSD's. Sun/Oracle and
> NetBSD went out of their way to understand these and other GNUisms.
Okay, that reduces the size of the problem considerably.
> 2. NetBSD -- I haven't try it myself (I can send my test program if
> you are interested)
I'd be happy to try it, but I see downthread that you already did,
so that seems unnecessary.
I still wonder if we shouldn't have more than zero testing of our
NLS behavior, but that's just a generalized worry not a concern
over any specific feature.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-03-17 15:50:39 | Re: libpq: Process buffered SSL read bytes to support records >8kB on async API |
Previous Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-03-17 15:48:02 | Re: Adding support for SSLKEYLOGFILE in the frontend |