| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64 |
| Date: | 2004-01-23 18:18:35 |
| Message-ID: | 4011657B.2090501@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
>>XFS.. hands down.
>>
>>
>
>I thought it was you who recently said you thought there was some
>sort of possible caching problem there?
>
>
>
Not I. We have had issues with JFS and data corruption on a powerout but
XFS has been rock solid in all of our tests.
XFS also has the interesting ability (although I have yet to test it)
that will allow you
to take a snapshot of the filesystem. Thus you can have filesystem level
backups
of the PGDATA directory that are consistent even though the database is
running.
There is nothing else on Linux that comes close to that. Plus XFS has been
proven in a 64 bit environment (Irix).
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>A
>
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Spiegelberg | 2004-01-23 18:53:21 | Linux Cluster File Systems |
| Previous Message | Rajesh Kumar Mallah | 2004-01-23 18:16:30 | Re: [SQL] Database diagram |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Spiegelberg | 2004-01-23 18:53:21 | Linux Cluster File Systems |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2004-01-23 17:55:44 | Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64 |