From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Thompson <dave(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64 |
Date: | 2004-01-23 16:51:03 |
Message-ID: | 401150F7.1040802@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-performance |
Dave Thompson wrote:
> Hello All
>
> Just wanted to gather opinions on what file system has the best
> balance between performance and reliability when used on a quad
> processor machine running SuSE64. Thanks
XFS.. hands down.
>
> DAve
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2004-01-23 17:55:44 | Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64 |
Previous Message | Dave Thompson | 2004-01-23 16:43:28 | High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | lnd | 2004-01-23 17:06:30 | Optimizing SQL: bind variables, prepared stms, histograms |
Previous Message | Dave Thompson | 2004-01-23 16:43:28 | High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64 |