From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: TOAST usage setting |
Date: | 2007-05-30 15:14:12 |
Message-ID: | 4010.1180538052@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Whereas if you set toast_tuples_per_page to 8k then the only option for
> Postgres will be to put each datum in its own page and waste 1-3k on every
> page.
No, because actually the code is designed to make the toast chunk size
just enough less than 8K that the tuples fit.
The shorter-than-normal tuples carrying the last chunk of any particular
datum are going to result in wasted space to the extent that we can't
pack them together on a page, but that's true now. Right now, if you
have a large toasted datum, it mostly will consist of just-under-2K
tuples that are sized so that there's no noticeable wasted space on a
page with 4 of them. There isn't any advantage to that compared to one
just-under-8K tuple AFAICS, and it takes 4 times as much work to insert
or retrieve 'em.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-30 15:27:57 | Re: 'Waiting on lock' |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2007-05-30 15:05:02 | 'Waiting on lock' |