Re: I got bit by that darn GEQO setting again...

From: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: I got bit by that darn GEQO setting again...
Date: 2004-01-17 07:48:51
Message-ID: 4008E8E3.6070004@mascari.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:

>Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>But just as a quick notice to those upgrading from 7.3 to 7.4 with fully
>>normalized databases requiring > 11 joins, the GEQO setting can be a
>>killer...
>>
>>
>
>Uh ... dare I ask whether you think it's too high? Or too low?
>
>
Too low. In fact, after testing some of my queries which are a bit large
(# of tables) in size, I usually just wind up turning it off. I know
that's insufficient evidence to do anything, but I have yet to stumble
upon a query where GEQO performs better. Do the ODSL folks run their
performance tests with it on? off? both? I'm sorry I haven't had the
time to develop a rigorous test... :-(

Mike Mascari

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Leif K-Brooks 2004-01-17 10:49:59 How should I get started?
Previous Message David Helgason 2004-01-17 06:32:08 Re: I got bit by that darn GEQO setting again...