Re: Fwd: Question

From: "Goulet, Dick" <DGoulet(at)vicr(dot)com>
To: "Michael Fuhr" <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, "German Raul Hoyos Parravicino" <rhoyos(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Question
Date: 2006-03-08 14:07:00
Message-ID: 4001DEAF7DF9BD498B58B45051FBEA650340B9B9@25exch1.vicorpower.vicr.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

The syntax in Oracle is "is null" or "is not null" as in:

select count(*) from module_master where gatekeeper_status is null;

And yes that does work in PostGreSql. Now if your talking about the
Oracle function NVL, for Null Value, no that does not work and I don't
see a similar function in PostGreSql. You could create one easily
enough.

Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified DBA

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-admin-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Michael Fuhr
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 6:45 PM
To: German Raul Hoyos Parravicino
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Fwd: Question

On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 05:09:56PM -0500, German Raul Hoyos Parravicino
wrote:
> I have a problem developing a ECPG program. I am making a programa
using
> FETCH, when the second row is sent the following message appear:
>
> ==>sqlcode [-213] msg[NULL value without indicator in line 1192.]
[...]
> Is it possible to use something similar to "isnull" in Oracle?

Are you looking for the SQL-standard COALESCE?

test=> SELECT COALESCE('foo', 'bar');
coalesce
----------
foo
(1 row)

test=> SELECT COALESCE(NULL, 'bar');
coalesce
----------
bar
(1 row)

See also the ECPG documentation on using indicators to detect NULL.

--
Michael Fuhr

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2006-03-08 17:24:12 Re: Fwd: Question
Previous Message Fabrice.Sznajderman 2006-03-08 08:23:41 Re: VACUUM Error?