| From: | Joerg Hessdoerfer <Joerg(dot)Hessdoerfer(at)sea-gmbh(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Continuous inserts... |
| Date: | 2000-08-22 07:44:02 |
| Message-ID: | 4.3.2.7.0.20000822094032.00b01290@192.168.0.1 |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Hi!
At 08:18 18.08.00 -0700, you wrote:
[...]
>I didn't try with vacuum, I just did a table lock and that
>seemed to still hang the inserts with two tables, so I figured
>maximum safety was adding the third table. If it works with two
>that's much cooler. Was this with real data or just a small test
>set?
It was a test set ... ~20000 records, *BUT* I found that postgres
decides when it starts to use the rule - means, if you do continous
inserts on the table and create the rule, there's a varying time until
the rule applies. In my first tests, I re-connected the DB very often,
and the the change seemed immediate.
Any ideas on how to 'promote' the rules faster?!?
Greetings,
Joe
--
+------**** Science & Engineering Applications GmbH ****------+
| |
| Joerg Hessdoerfer |
| Leading SW developer Phone: +49 (0)2203-962211 |
| S.E.A GmbH Fax: -962212 |
| D-51147 Koeln Internet: joerg(dot)hessdoerfer(at)sea-gmbh(dot)com |
| http://www.sea-gmbh.com |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex Guryanow | 2000-08-22 10:03:42 | using INTERSECT and UNION in IN clause |
| Previous Message | Andreas Tille | 2000-08-22 07:39:18 | Re: Beginner problems with functions |