Re: [GENERAL] Use of Serial Datatype and Sequence Issue

From: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Use of Serial Datatype and Sequence Issue
Date: 2001-11-06 07:58:40
Message-ID: 4.2.0.58.20011106085417.00a987b0@pop.freesurf.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-general

At 00:28 02/11/01 +0000, you wrote:
>I am new to postgres and am in the process of creating a new database of
>several 100 tables. Most of the tables have a serial datatype. When the
>table is created psql says it is creating an implicit sequence. Yet
>when I drop the table and even when I drop the database the sequence is
>still there. When I try to re-create the table it fails beacuse the
>sequence already exists. This same behaviour exists for indexes. How
>can I get rid of any sequences or indexes that have been created. I
>would prefer not to explicitly drop each one. Ideally I would like to
>drop the table and have all related indexes, sequences dropped.

pgAdmin2 knows how to drop indexes when dropping a table:
http://pgadmin.postgresql.org
It might not be interesting to drop a sequence as it can be used by
multiple tables.

Dave: do you think pgAdmin2 should drop a sequence when dropping a table?

Best regards,
Jean-Michel POURE

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2001-11-06 08:17:05 Re: [GENERAL] Use of Serial Datatype and Sequen
Previous Message Keary Suska 2001-11-06 06:42:51 Re: Use of Serial Datatype and Sequence Issue

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2001-11-06 08:02:06 Re: functions, shell script
Previous Message Jean-Michel POURE 2001-11-06 07:52:35 Re: Referring a table in another database