From: | Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Limitations on PGSQL |
Date: | 2001-11-05 14:52:44 |
Message-ID: | 4.2.0.58.20011105155124.00a91ca0@pop.freesurf.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
>Long connection time - if you are using the web you will have to use some
>sort of persistant scheme e.g. Apache::DBI otherwise you will handle
>around 5 requests per sec on a decent computer. I wonder whether it would
>be possible for it to either reconnect, keeping the connection to a new
>database or user, or reuse it's kids - like Apache.
Php allows persistent connections. Don't you think?
http://uk.php.net/manual/en/configuration.php#ini.sect.pgsql
Postgres Configuration Directives
pgsql.allow_persistent boolean
Whether to allow persistent Postgres connections.
pgsql.max_persistent integer
The maximum number of persistent Postgres connections per process.
pgsql.max_links integer
The maximum number of Postgres connections per process, including
persistent connections.
Best regards,
Jean-Michel POURE
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2001-11-05 15:35:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Porting Web application written in Oracle 8 |
Previous Message | Brian Hirt | 2001-11-05 14:31:06 | request for advise |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Buttafuoco | 2001-11-05 14:53:12 | Storage Location Patch Proposal for V7.3 |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2001-11-05 14:47:06 | Re: Proposal: 7.2b2 today |