Re: DROP/CREATE

From: Jean-Michel POURE <jm(dot)poure(at)freesurf(dot)fr>
To: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DROP/CREATE
Date: 2001-10-30 10:38:48
Message-ID: 4.2.0.58.20011030112818.00a80e20@pop.freesurf.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers


>Yes (and I agree that it would be a good feature), but that will still
>require full client side parsing of the code to figure out the dependencies
>- I for one, do not wish to try to recreate (and keep up-to-date) the
>PostgreSQL parser in VB. Besides which, if we take it that far then we might
>just as well use reverse engineered SQL to scan for dependencies. I know you
>don't like reverse engineered code, but bear in mind that the important bits
>are reported directly from PostgreSQL (e.g. pg_proc.prosrc).

IMHO view modification can be achieved within one transaction, without
development table nor PL/pgSQL.

Could you give me your feedback again for view modification:
- Attempt to create a view with the new definition to ensure it's valid.
- Open transaction (in locking mode as we may drop triggers in many tables).
- Drop dependent views in OID order. Keep CREATE SQL strings for future usage.
- Drop dependent triggers. Keep CREATE SQL strings for future usage.
- Drop dependent rules. Keep CREATE SQL strings for future usage.
- Drop the old view and create the new view.
- Create dependent views, triggers and rules.
- Re-apply any comments and ACLs.
- Commit transaction.
- Query pg_class for the updated OID.

This would allow migration from pgAdmin I to pgAdmin II.

/Later,
Jean-Michel

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2001-10-30 10:49:59 Re: DROP/CREATE
Previous Message Dave Page 2001-10-30 10:02:00 Re: DROP/CREATE

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tille, Andreas 2001-10-30 10:44:16 Re: Serious performance problem
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2001-10-30 10:20:57 Re: Serious performance problem