From: | John Brothers <johnbr(at)mindspring(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
Date: | 2000-01-28 03:51:40 |
Message-ID: | 4.1.20000127224856.00c97350@pop.mindspring.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
I don't think that patch will work - Hiroshi whipped up that patch for me a
week ago for a
different problem - we have a table with duplicate primary keys, which
seems to be
an arithmetic overflow problem because the index key values can be both
very large positive
and very large negative numbers.
At 11:37 AM 1/27/00 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Could you try the follwoing patch ?
>
>Hiroshi, I don't see this in the main tree, nor do I see it having been
>requested for application. Should I apply it?
>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> Hiroshi Inoue
------------
johnbr(at)incanta(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-01-28 04:40:56 | RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
Previous Message | John Brothers | 2000-01-28 03:48:39 | Re: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-01-28 04:10:03 | OR-of-ANDs dragon slain ... or at least seriously wounded ... |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-01-28 03:48:42 | Re: [HACKERS] [6.5.3] 'attribute not found' |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-01-28 04:40:56 | RE: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |
Previous Message | John Brothers | 2000-01-28 03:48:39 | Re: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 |