From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: a back up question |
Date: | 2017-12-05 22:55:41 |
Message-ID: | 3ffd93e7-32e9-928e-18be-f4039e77d8c3@hogranch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/5/2017 2:09 PM, Martin Mueller wrote:
> Time is not really a problem for me, if we talk about hours rather
> than days. On a roughly comparable machine I’ve made backups of
> databases less than 10 GB, and it was a matter of minutes. But I know
> that there are scale problems. Sometimes programs just hang if the
> data are beyond some size. Is that likely in Postgres if you go from
> ~ 10 GB to ~100 GB? There isn’t any interdependence among my tables
> beyond queries I construct on the fly, because I use the database in
> a single user environment
another factor is restore time. restores have to create indexes.
creating indexes on multi-million-row tables can take awhile. (hint, be
sure to set maintenance_work_mem to 1GB before doing this!)
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2017-12-05 23:05:03 | Re: a back up question |
Previous Message | Carl Karsten | 2017-12-05 22:51:28 | Re: a back up question |