From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com" <ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Allow escape in application_name |
Date: | 2021-09-10 00:23:45 |
Message-ID: | 3feb44e8-0bee-01bf-986b-75cafa0d506e@oss.nttdata.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/09/09 21:36, kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com wrote:
> In this case, I expected to use fallback_application_name instead of appname,
> but I missed the case where appname was set as a server option.
> Maybe we should do continue when buf.data is \0.
Yes.
+ /*
+ * If the input format is wrong and the string becomes '\0',
+ * this parameter is no longer used.
+ * We conitnue searching application_name.
+ */
+ if (values[i] == '\0')
+ continue;
+ else
+ break;
We can simplify the code as follows.
if (values[i] != '\0')
break;
> Yeah, and I found that "%+5p" is another example.
> Our padding function does not understand plus sign
> (and maybe this is the specification of printf()), but strtol() reads.
>
> I did not fix here because I lost my way. Do we treats these cases
> and continue to use strtol(), or use process_padding()?
IMO it's better to use process_padding() to process log_line_prefix and
postgres_fdw.application in the same way as possible.
Which would be less confusing.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-09-10 01:07:51 | Re: Add jsonlog log_destination for JSON server logs |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-09-09 23:55:31 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |