From: | Rihad <grihad(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why doesn't autovacuum/analyze run in due time after calling pg_stat_reset? |
Date: | 2023-08-23 14:06:43 |
Message-ID: | 3fafd9d5-ba37-8abf-ba46-ca51b6f706c9@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8/21/23 20:50, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 8/21/23 09:31, Rihad wrote:
>> On 8/21/23 20:17, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>> On 8/21/23 09:09, Rihad wrote:
>>>> On 8/21/23 20:00, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>>
>
>>
>> Sorry, they are all as per default, commented out in the config.
>>
>> There are no long running queries, otherwise they wouldn't be
>> vacuumed/analyzed in due time after running first manual analyze,
>> which updates n_live_tup to match reltuples.
>>
>
> My only remaining suggestion is to closely monitor the Postgres log
> and see if provides a clue.
>
I'm awfully sorry, I read the autovacuum manual carefully, it isn't
n_live_tup, but reltuples that is taken into account during the calculation.
vacuum threshold = vacuum base threshold + vacuum scale factor * number of tuples
where the vacuum base threshold is autovacuum_vacuum_threshold
<https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-autovacuum.html#GUC-AUTOVACUUM-VACUUM-THRESHOLD>,
the vacuum scale factor is autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor
<https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/runtime-config-autovacuum.html#GUC-AUTOVACUUM-VACUUM-SCALE-FACTOR>,
*and the number of tuples is **|pg_class|**.**|reltuples|**.*
Your first suggestion was to RTFM.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christian Barthel | 2023-08-23 14:24:46 | PL/pgSQL RETURN QUERY and DOMAIN CHECKs |
Previous Message | Ian Lawrence Barwick | 2023-08-23 11:07:09 | Re: [EXTERNAL] Oracle FDW version |