Re: Maximum Availability Architecture(MAA) for PostgreSQL

From: Jan Lentfer <Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de>
To: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Maximum Availability Architecture(MAA) for PostgreSQL
Date: 2015-04-08 12:44:09
Message-ID: 3f89a3e198877cffec4b544a9fc0e033@imap.lan.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Am 2015-04-08 10:22, schrieb Wei Shan:
> In the PostgreSQL world, what do you guys think would be the
> equivalent?
>
> Attached is a diagram I have thought of. Clusters of pg-pool2 used to
> load balance the connection in and for connection failover when a DB
> crashes. Between master and slave, sync replication is being used for
> zero-data-loss.

Why do you need 3 pg-pool instances? 2 instances uses watchdog should
be sufficient?
And if you plan to use sync replication you need to plan for 3
PostgreSQL Servers (a 3rd one that the sync replication can fail-over
to).

Regards,

Jan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wei Shan 2015-04-08 15:35:07 Re: Maximum Availability Architecture(MAA) for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Jan Lentfer 2015-04-08 12:31:38 Re: pgdump with batch insert