From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Apple's ranlib warns about protocol_openssl.c |
Date: | 2021-12-16 15:48:19 |
Message-ID: | 3f72b209-7478-6f72-d5db-bd2b143931a4@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 16.12.21 16:25, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Apple's ranlib doesn't like empty translation units[1], but
>> protocol_openssl.c doesn't define any symbols (unless you have an
>> ancient EOL'd openssl), so longfin and CI say:
>
>> /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/ranlib:
>> file: libpgcommon.a(protocol_openssl.o) has no symbols
>
>> I guess we still can't switch to (Apple) libtool. Maybe configure
>> should be doing a test and adding it to LIBOBJS or a similar variable
>> only if necessary, or something like that?
>
> Hmm ... right now, with only one test to make, the configure change
> wouldn't be that hard; but that might change in future, plus I'm
> unsure how to do it in MSVC.
>
> A lazy man's answer could be to ensure the translation unit isn't
> empty, say by adding
These are not errors, right? So why is this a problem?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2021-12-16 15:50:28 | Re: [PATCH] Accept IP addresses in server certificate SANs |
Previous Message | Joshua Brindle | 2021-12-16 15:43:15 | Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs |